Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: An indivisible union? Assessing the marriage of Hochschild’s emotional labour concept and labour process theory
Authors: Brook, Paul A.
First Published: 2010
Publisher: Inderscience
Citation: International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2010, 4 (3/4), pp. 326-342 (16)
Abstract: Labour process theory (LPT) has progressively but critically adopted Hochschild's emotional labour theory, principally for analysis of service work. However, until recently there has been little detailed assessment from within the LPT tradition of emotional labour's theoretical roots, structure and overall compatibility. This article critically assesses contemporary debates within LPT on the compatibility of Hochschild's theory. It argues that while she makes foundational use of Marx's theory of labour power, she inadequately captures the contradictory nature of employment relations, the social basis of workplace emotions and the incompleteness of management control. This is principally due to her tendency to focus on the harm to individuals of emotional labour via her individualised concepts of 'transmutation of feelings', 'surface acting and deep acting'. For Hochschild's theory to be compatible, it requires a thorough dialectical understanding of workplace emotions and their management as contradictory social phenomena, which workers experience individually and collectively.
DOI Link: 10.1504/IJMCP.2010.037816
ISSN: 1478-1484
eISSN: 1741-8135
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Limited. Deposited with reference to the publisher's archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJMCP Indivisible union 2009 (IRIS final).pdf405.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.