Leicester Research Archive

Leicester Research Archive >
College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology >
Health Sciences, Department of >
Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/10339

Title: Do informed consent documents for cancer trials do what they should? A study of manifest and latent functions
Authors: Armstrong, Natalie
Dixon-Woods, Mary
Thomas, A
Rusk, G
Tarrant, Carolyn Clare
Issue Date: 22-Mar-2012
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing (an imprint of Wiley)
Citation: Sociology of Health and Illness, 2012 (in press)
Abstract: Though patient information leaflets (PILs) are provided to those invited to take part in medical research, they usually fall short in facilitating informed decisions about participation. We aimed to explore why there is an enduring requirement for a process that seems not to ‘work’, and to explain why the problems have proven resistant to correction. We analysed applications for ethical approval for 13 oncology trials and related official guidance. We interviewed 26 patients invited to participate in the trials. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method. We show that PILs function latently to satisfy purposes other than their manifest function as a decision-facilitating tool. PILs are the outcome of a process of institutional scripting that is strongly shaped by the accountability demands inherent in the ethical review process. This results in the PIL being made to serve purposes both as a prospectus and as a contract. Though PILs have value for some patients, most do not recognise these documents as operating primarily in their interests. Patients make decisions in ways that deviate from official ideals. This analysis is important in recognising that no simple technical fix is available, and in enhancing sociological understanding of the institutional role of documents.
DOI Link: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01469.x
ISSN: 0141-9889
eISSN: 1467-9566
Links: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.111(...)
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/10339
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2012 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness © 2012 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness/Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Description: The definitive version is available at www.wileyonlinelibrary.com
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Cancer PILs paper - LRA version.pdf521.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

MAINTAINER