Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment?
Authors: Baume, D.
Yorke, M.
Coffey, Martin G.
First Published: 2004
Citation: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2004, 29 (4), pp.451-477
Abstract: In an attempt to gain a fuller understanding of the basis of grading, ten assessors each assessed two portfolios drawn from the course archive which had been produced by participants on a course in teaching in higher education. Assessors gave a grade or judgement on each of a portfolio's 75 portfolio elements, reasons for each judgement they made, and recorded any alternative judgement they had considered. There were substantial differences between the judgements made during the study and those made when the portfolios were originally assessed. This article explores the differences between the original and experimental assessments, and then analyses reasons given by assessors for the judgements made. Beyond these particulars, the paper suggests some fundamental and problematic issues about the conduct and the reform of assessment, and offers a process which can be used to investigate and improve the quality, in particular the reliability, of any summative assessment.
DOI Link: 10.1080/02602930310001689037
ISSN: 0260-2938
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.