Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/13236
Title: Clinical research without consent in adults in the emergency setting: a review of patient and public views.
Authors: Lecouturier, J
Rodgers, H
Ford, GA
Rapley, T
Stobbart, L
Louw, SJ
Murtagh, MJ
First Published: 2008
Citation: BMC MED ETHICS, 2008, 9, pp. 9-9
Abstract: In emergency research, obtaining informed consent can be problematic. Research to develop and improve treatments for patients admitted to hospital with life-threatening and debilitating conditions is much needed yet the issue of research without consent (RWC) raises concerns about unethical practices and the loss of individual autonomy. Consistent with the policy and practice turn towards greater patient and public involvement in health care decisions, in the US, Canada and EU, guidelines and legislation implemented to protect patients and facilitate acute research with adults who are unable to give consent have been developed with little involvement of the lay public. This paper reviews research examining public opinion regarding RWC for research in emergency situations, and whether the rules and regulations permitting research of this kind are in accordance with the views of those who ultimately may be the most affected.
DOI Link: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-9
eISSN: 1472-6939
Links: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/13236
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.