Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods.
Authors: Dixon-Woods, M
Sutton, A
Shaw, R
Miller, T
Smith, J
Young, B
Bonas, S
Booth, A
Jones, D
First Published: Jan-2007
Citation: J HEALTH SERV RES POLICY, 2007, 12 (1), pp. 42-47
Abstract: Qualitative research is increasingly valued as part of the evidence for policy and practice, but how it should be appraised is contested. Various appraisal methods, including checklists and other structured approaches, have been proposed but rarely evaluated. We aimed to compare three methods for appraising qualitative research papers that were candidates for inclusion in a systematic review of evidence on support for breast-feeding.
DOI Link: 10.1258/135581907779497486
ISSN: 1355-8196
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Medical and Social Care Education

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.