Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/16614
Title: | Randomised controlled trial and parallel economic evaluation of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR). |
Authors: | Peek, GJ Elbourne, D Mugford, M Tiruvoipati, R Wilson, A Allen, E Clemens, F Firmin, R Hardy, P Hibbert, C Jones, N Killer, H Thalanany, M Truesdale, A |
First Published: | Jul-2010 |
Citation: | HEALTH TECHNOL ASSESS, 2010, 14 (35), pp. 1-46 |
Abstract: | To determine the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe adult respiratory failure. |
DOI Link: | 10.3310/hta14350 |
ISSN: | 1366-5278 |
Links: | http://hdl.handle.net/2381/16614 |
Type: | Journal Article |
Appears in Collections: | Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.