Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/17224
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNorwood, MG-
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, GM-
dc.contributor.authorBown, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorFishwick, G-
dc.contributor.authorLondon, NJ-
dc.contributor.authorSayers, RD-
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-24T09:03:14Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-24T09:03:14Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-
dc.identifier.citationPOSTGRAD MED J, 2007, 83 (975), pp. 21-27-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/17224-
dc.description.abstractThe operative mortality following conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has not fallen significantly over the past two decades. Since its inception in 1991, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has provided an alternative to open AAA repair and perhaps an opportunity to improve operative mortality. Two recent large randomised trials have demonstrated the short and medium term benefit of EVAR over open AAA repair, although data on the long term efficacy of the technique are still lacking. This review aimed at providing an overview of EVAR and a discussion of the potential benefits and current limitations of the technique.-
dc.formatmetadata-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.sourcePubMed-
dc.source.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/-
dc.subjectAortic Aneurysm-
dc.subjectAbdominal-
dc.subjectAortic Rupture-
dc.subjectAtherectomy-
dc.subjectBlood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.subjectStents-
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleEndovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/pgmj.2006.051177-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-0756-
dc.identifier.pii83/975/21-
dc.description.irispid20688-
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.