Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis: a multiple meta-analyses approach according to the type of strategy.|
Le May M
|Citation:||J AM COLL CARDIOL, 2006, 48 (7), pp. 1326-1335|
|Abstract:||We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that enrolled ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolysis to assess the potential benefits of: 1) rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus no PCI; 2) systematic and early (< or =24 h) PCI versus delayed or ischemia-guided PCI; 3) fibrinolysis-facilitated PCI versus primary PCI alone.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.