Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/19012
Title: A new analysis of the short-duration, hard-spectrum GRB 051103, a possible extragalactic soft gamma repeater giant flare
Authors: Hurley, K.
Bellm, E.
Rowlinson, A.
Tanvir, N. R.
O'Brien, P. T.
Wiersema, K.
Rol, E.
Perley, D.
Mitrofanov, I. G.
Golovin, D. V.
Kozyrev, A. S.
Litvak, M. L.
Sanin, A. B.
Boynton, W.
Fellows, C.
Harshmann, K.
Ohno, M.
Yamaoka, K.
Nakagawa, Y. E.
Smith, D. M.
Cline, T.
Rol, E.
Levan, A.
Rhoads, J.
Fruchter, A.
Bersier, D.
Kavelaars, JJ.
Gehrels, N.
Krimm, H.
Palmer, D. M.
Duncan, R. C.
Wigger, C.
Hajdas, W.
Atteia, J-L.
Ricker, G.
Vanderspek, R.
Rau, A.
von Kienlin A.
First Published: 21-Mar-2010
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2010, 403 (1), pp. 342-352
Abstract: GRB 051103 is considered to be a candidate soft gamma repeater (SGR) extragalactic giant magnetar flare by virtue of its proximity on the sky to M81/M82, as well as its time history, localization and energy spectrum. We have derived a refined interplanetary network localization for this burst which reduces the size of the error box by over a factor of 2. We examine its time history for evidence of a periodic component, which would be one signature of an SGR giant flare, and conclude that this component is neither detected nor detectable under reasonable assumptions. We analyse the time-resolved energy spectra of this event with improved time and energy resolution, and conclude that although the spectrum is very hard its temporal evolution at late times cannot be determined, which further complicates the giant flare association. We also present new optical observations reaching limiting magnitudes of R > 24.5, about 4-mag deeper than previously reported. In tandem with serendipitous observations of M81 taken immediately before and 1 month after the burst, these place strong constraints on any rapidly variable sources in the region of the refined error ellipse proximate to M81. We do not find any convincing afterglow candidates from either background galaxies or sources in M81, although within the refined error region we do locate two UV bright star-forming regions which may host SGRs. A supernova remnant (SNR) within the error ellipse could provide further support for an SGR giant flare association, but we were unable to identify any SNR within the error ellipse. These data still do not allow strong constraints on the nature of the GRB 051103 progenitor, and suggest that candidate extragalactic SGR giant flares will be difficult, although not impossible, to confirm.
DOI Link: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16118.x
ISSN: 0035-8711
eISSN: 1365-2966
Links: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/19012
http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/403/1/342
Version: Publisher Version
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2010 the authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MNRAS-2010-Hurley-342-52.pdfPublished (publisher PDF) 5.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.