Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/22596
Title: Systematic review of mass media interventions designed to improve public recognition of stroke symptoms, emergency response and early treatment.
Authors: Lecouturier, J.
Rodgers, H.
Murtagh, Madeleine J.
White, M.
Ford, G.A.
Thomson, R.G.
First Published: 23-Dec-2010
Citation: BMC Public Health, 2010, 10 : 784
Abstract: Background: Mass media interventions have been implemented to improve emergency response to stroke given the emergence of effective acute treatments, but their impact is unclear. Methods Systematic review of mass media interventions aimed at improving emergency response to stroke, with narrative synthesis and review of intervention development. Results: Ten studies were included (six targeted the public, four both public and professionals) published between 1992 and 2010. Only three were controlled before and after studies, and only one had reported how the intervention was developed. Campaigns aimed only at the public reported significant increase in awareness of symptoms/signs, but little impact on awareness of need for emergency response. Of the two controlled before and after studies, one reported no impact on those over 65 years, the age group at increased risk of stroke and most likely to witness a stroke, and the other found a significant increase in awareness of two or more warning signs of stroke in the same group post-intervention. One campaign targeted at public and professionals did not reduce time to presentation at hospital to within two hours, but increased and sustained thrombolysis rates. This suggests the campaign had a primary impact on professionals and improved the way that services for stroke were organised. Conclusions: Campaigns aimed at the public may raise awareness of symptoms/signs of stroke, but have limited impact on behaviour. Campaigns aimed at both public and professionals may have more impact on professionals than the public. New campaigns should follow the principles of good design and be robustly evaluated.
DOI Link: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-784
eISSN: 1471-2458
Links: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/22596
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/784
Version: Publisher Version
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1186_1471-2458-10-784.pdfPublished (publisher PDF)279.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.