Leicester Research Archive >
College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology >
Health Sciences, Department of >
Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Qualitative study of the meaning of personal care in general practice|
|Authors: ||Tarrant, Carolyn Clare|
Windridge, Kate C.
Freeman, George K.
|Issue Date: ||14-Jun-2003|
|Publisher: ||BMJ Publishing|
|Citation: ||BMJ, 2003, 326, pp. 1310- (see note under "description")|
|Abstract: ||Objectives: To explore patients’ perceptions of the features of personal care and how far these are shared
by healthcare providers; whether a continuing relationship between a health professional and a patient is essential for personal care; and the circumstances in which a continuing relationship is
Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews using the “framework” approach.
Setting: Six general practices in Leicestershire.
Participants: 40 patients aged ≥ 18 years, 13 general practitioners, 10 practice and community nurses, and six practice administrative staff, recruited through
Results: Patients’ and healthcare providers’ accounts cited human communication, individualised treatment
or management, and whole person care as features of personal care. Personal care was described in three different contexts—a continuing relationship, a single
consultation, and from the practice as a whole. The extent to which a continuing relationship was important for personal care was determined by the reason for consulting, as well as patients’ consulting
history and lifestyle.
Conclusions: Patients, general practitioners, primary care nurses, and administrative staff hold similar views
on the meaning of personal care, despite differences of emphasis reflecting their different roles. Personal care is promoted by but not always dependent on a
continuing provider-patient relationship; human communication and individualised care emerged as important in making care personal whatever the context. Most respondents valued relationships in
primary care and had clear ideas about when care in the context of a relationship was most valuable.|
|DOI Link: ||10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1310|
|Version: ||Publisher version|
|Status: ||Peer reviewed|
|Rights: ||Copyright © 2003 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.|
|Description: ||This is the full version of a paper published as BMJ, 2003, 326, pp.1310-1312. The full version is also available online at www.bmj.com|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences|
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.