Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Scientific Management Revisited: Did Taylorism Fail Because of a Too Positive Image of Human Nature?
Authors: Wagner-Tsukamoto, Sigmund
First Published: 2008
Publisher: Emerald
Citation: Journal of Management History, 2008, 14 (4), pp. 348-372 (25)
Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to critically question conventional views of the one-dimensional, mechanistic and negative image of human nature of Scientific Management. Both for worker behavior and for managerial behavior positive aspects of an image of human nature are reconstructed in organizational economic terms. Design/methodology/approach – Through institutional economic reconstruction, drawing on the methods and concepts of organizational and institutional economics, the portrayal of workers and managers by Scientific Management is critically assessed. Findings – It is suggested that a conceptual asymmetry exists in Taylor’s writings regarding the portrayal of human nature of workers and managers. Whereas for workers a model of self-interest was applied (through the concepts of “systematic soldering” and “natural soldiering”), Taylor portrayed managers through a positive, behavioral model of human nature that depicted the manager as “heartily cooperative”. The key thesis is that by modeling managers through a rather positive image of human nature Taylor could no longer methodically apply the model of economic man in order to test out and prevent interaction conflict between potentially self-interested managers and workers. Research limitations/implications – The paper focused on Scientific Management to advance the thesis that the portrayal of human nature has been ill approached by management and organization theorists who were apparently pioneering an institutional and organizational economics. Future research has to broaden the scope of research to other pioneers inmanagement and organization research, but also to critics in behavioral sciences, such as organization psychology, who may misunderstand how economics approaches the portrayal of human nature, in particular regarding self-interest. Practical implications – Taylor’s portrayal of managers as naturally good persons, who were not self-interested, caused implementation conflict and implementation problems for Scientific Management and led to his summoning by the US Congress. By modeling managers as heartily cooperative, Taylor could no longer analyze potentially self-interested behavior, even opportunistic behavior of managers in their interactions with workers. Scientific Management had thus no remedy to handle “soldiering” of managers. This insight, that managerialism needs to be accounted for in a management theory, has manifold practical implications for management consultancy,management education, and for the practice of management in general. Students and practitioners have to be informed about the necessary and useful role a model of self-interest (economic man) methodically plays in economic management theory. Originality/value – The paper reconstructs the portrayal of human nature in early management theory, which seemingly anticipated the advances – and certain pitfalls – of modern institutional economics. The paper unearths, from an economic perspective, conceptual misunderstandings of Taylor regarding his image of human nature of workers and managers.
DOI Link: 10.1108/17511340810893108
ISSN: 1751-1348
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Deposited with reference to the publisher's archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JMH Taylor paper 10-04-2008.pdfPost-review (final submitted)361.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.