Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A GIS model for mapping spatial patterns and distribution of wild land in Scotland
Authors: Carver, Steve
Comber, Alexis J.
McMorran, Rob
Nutter, Steve
First Published: 15-Mar-2012
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 104 (3-4), pp. 395-409.
Abstract: This paper presents a robust and repeatable method for mapping wildness in support of decisions about planning, policy and management in protected landscapes. This is based around the application of high resolution data and GIS models to map four attributes of wildness: perceived naturalness of land cover, absence of modern human artefacts in the landscape, rugged and challenging nature of the terrain, and remoteness from mechanised access. These are combined using multi-criteria evaluation and fuzzy methods to determine spatial patterns and variability in wild land quality. The approach is demonstrated and tested for the two national parks in Scotland: the Cairngorms National Park and the Loch Lomond and The Trossachs National Park. This is presented within a wider debate on the ability of such models to accurately depict and spatially define the concept of wildness within both the Scottish setting and the wider global context. Conclusions are drawn as to scalability and transferability, together with potential future applications including local and national level mapping, and support for landscape character assessment, planning policy and development control. Maps of the wild land core, buffer and periphery areas of the two parks are presented.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.016
ISSN: 0169-2046
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. Deposited with reference to the publisher's archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Landscape and Urban Planning. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 104 (3-4), pp. 395-409. DOI#: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.016
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Geography

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
7_carver_et_al_LUP.pdfPost-review (final submitted)1.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.