Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning
Authors: Maltby, John
Day, Liz
Pinto, Diana G
Hogan, Rebecca A.
Wood, Alex M.
First Published: 23-Dec-2012
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Consciousness and Cognition, 2013, 22 (1), pp. 137-147
Abstract: The current paper proposes the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis; that beliefs in being unlucky are associated with deficits in executive functioning. Four studies suggest initial support for the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis via four aspects of executive functioning. Study 1 established that self-reports of dysexecutive symptoms predicted unique variance in beliefs in being unlucky after controlling for a number of other variables previously reported to be related to beliefs around luck. Studies 2 to 4 demonstrated support for the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis via assessment of executive functioning via: (1) two fundamental executive functions (shifting and inhibition), (2) emotional processes related to executive functioning as described by the Somatic Marker hypothesis, and (3) higher executive functions as accessed via divergent thinking. The findings suggest that individuals' beliefs in being unlucky are accompanied by a range of deficits in executive functioning.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.014
ISSN: 1053-8100
eISSN: 1090-2376
Type: Journal Article
Description: Full text of this item is not currently available on the LRA. The final published version may be available through the links above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.