Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Multi-Heuristic Strategy Choice: Response to Krueger
Authors: Colman, Andrew M.
Pulford, Briony D.
Lawrence, C.L.
First Published: 2014
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Citation: Decision, 2014, in press
Abstract: Social projection cannot adequately explain coordination in common interest games, and nothing resembling social projection underlies team reasoning or strong Stackelberg reasoning. Although our experiments suggest that cognitive hierarchy Level-1 reasoning was most influential in the games that we investigated, strong Stackelberg reasoning and team reasoning were also used quite frequently by the players.
ISSN: 2325-9965
eISSN: 2325-9973
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: © 2014, American Psychological Association (APA). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.
Description: This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Multi-Heuristic Strategy Choice.pdfPost-review (final submitted)24.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.