Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/28333
Title: Screening for depression in Parkinson's disease: the performance of two screening questions
Authors: Baillon, Sarah F.
Dennis, Michael
Lo, Nelson
Lindesay, James
First Published: 16-Oct-2013
Publisher: Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society
Citation: Age and Ageing, 2013, in press
Abstract: Background: the study objective was to evaluate the validity of the two questions recommended by the UK. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence for depression screening in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: one hundred and twenty patients attending a PD out-patient clinic were interviewed in a standardised manner using relevant sections of the Present State Examination- Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry to identify depression according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (4th edition) criteria. Participants then completed the two depression screening questions and the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). Results: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the two questions and GDS-15 for major and minor depression combined were calculated for different cut-off scores and a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted. A threshold of one or more positive responses to the two screening questions gave a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 84% ( positive predictive value 54%, negative predictive value 100%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.95. The optimal cut-off for the GDS-15 was 5/6, which gave a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 89% ( positive predictive value 59%, negative predictive value 97%), and the area under the curve was 0.92. Conclusion: this study shows that the two depression screening questions can be used as an initial screen for depression in patients with PD who have no significant cognitive impairment. A positive response to either of the questions would indicate that further diagnostic assessment may be warranted.
DOI Link: 10.1093/ageing/aft152
ISSN: 0002-0729
eISSN: 1468-2834
Links: http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/10/15/ageing.aft152
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/28333
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © The Author 2013. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy.
Description: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Age and Ageing following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [Age and Ageing, 2013, in press] is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/aft152.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
A & A rev manuscript 2 accepted changes.pdfPost-review (final submitted)167.96 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.