Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Was there a "popular medicine" in early modern Europe?|
|Authors:||Gentilcore, David C.|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis (Routledge) on behalf of the Folklore Society|
|Citation:||Folklore, 2004, 115 (2), pp. 151-166|
|Abstract:||This article considers the current trend to "problematise" popular culture, and with it the category "popular medicine" as established in the "popular errors" literature of the early modern period, and maintained in the modern era by folklorist-doctors such as Guiseppe Pitré. Recent social historians of medicine have been increasingly dismissive of notions of a separate, usually magical "popular medicine," instead offering models of diffusion of medical knowledge from the centre to the periphery. Based on Italian evidence, this article argues that, although it is impossible to draw absolute distinctions between schooled medical professionals, ecclesiastical healers, and illiterate "wise-women," there were important differences in the guiding mentality behind each approach.|
|Rights:||Copyright © 2004 The Folklore Society.|
|Description:||Full text of this item is not currently available on the LRA. The final published version may be available through the links above.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, School of Historical Studies|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.