Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/28948
Title: The ‘Battle of Stokes Croft’ on YouTube : The development of an ethical stance for the study of online comments
Authors: Reilly, Paul
First Published: 2013
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: SAGE Cases in Methodology
Abstract: The UK national media framed the riot in the Stokes Croft area of Bristol on 21 April 2011 as a manifestation of the local campaign against the opening of a Tesco supermarket in Cheltenham Road, an arterial route through the area. New media technologies enabled alternative perspectives on these events to emerge that not only rejected this link, but also criticised the ‘heavy-handed’ policing operation in the Telepathic Heights squat to remove petrol bombs that were allegedly being prepared for use against the supermarket. This project set out to examine whether the use of Youtube to share acts of ‘inverse surveillance’ elicited support for the viewpoints of local residents that had been largely absent from the media coverage of the disturbances. This case study will be used to explore the ethical dilemmas that arise from the analysis and presentation of user-generated content in academic publications. The strict ethical stance adopted for this project, which through the decision not to directly quote participants went far beyond conventional approaches towards the removal of Personally Identifiable Information, will be elucidated with a view to identifying best practice for the analysis of Youtube comments.
DOI Link: 10.4135/978144627305013509209
Links: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/methods-case-studies-2013/n89.xml?rskey=ivHsSo&row=1
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/28948
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2013, Sage. Archived with permission of the publisher.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Media and Communication

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Reilly copy.pdfPost-review (final submitted)183.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.