Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/2938
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Mora, Franciscoen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2009-12-08T16:22:31Z-
dc.date.available2009-12-08T16:22:31Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_GB
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Public Economics, 2006, Volume 90 (Issues 8-9), pp.1505-1518en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0047-2727en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047272706000260en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/2938-
dc.description.abstractWe provide an explanation to the puzzle of the existence of paid-for private schools that offer lower quality education than some tuition-free public alternatives. We consider a model of a city composed of two communities: the urban area and the suburbs. The suburban public school provides higher quality education at an implicit price: the higher tax burden plus a housing rent premium. If that price is high enough and the urban public school has a sufficiently low quality, intermediate income households live in the urban area and use a private school. Intermediate quality private schools, then, exist to serve these households' demand. Lower and higher income households use different quality public schools. Therefore, perfect income stratification across public and private education does not characterize this equilibrium.-
dc.formatMetadataen_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.titleThe Existence of Non-Elite Private Schoolsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.12.005-
dc.relation.raeRAE 2007-
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Economics

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.