Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The Elusive Divide between Interpretation and Legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998|
|Citation:||Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2004, 24 (2), pp.259-285|
|Abstract:||In recent case-law under the Human Rights Act 1998, the senior judiciary have reiterated the view that their task under section 3(1) of the Act is one of ‘interpretation rather than legislation’. This article has two main aims. The first is to provide a general, theoretical analysis of the extent to which it is possible (if at all) to distinguish between interpretation and legislation. The second is to examine the judicial understanding of this distinction, as revealed through judgments in the HRA case-law.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, School of Law|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.