Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/3076
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiola, Joséen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-06T13:18:51Z-
dc.date.available2007-12-06T13:18:51Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_GB
dc.identifier.citationCambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics, 2006, 15 (2), pp.152-160en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0963-1801en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=406394&fileId=S096318010606018Xen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/3076-
dc.description.abstractSome time ago, Ian Kennedy asked whether consent was the great bulwark of “patient's rights”? Is it a necessary nuisance granted as a concession to modish thinking? Is it simply a figment of some lawyer's (or—awful word—medical ethicist's) imagination which practitioners know is meaningless in practice? Is it just part of the rhetoric of “patient power”, sent to try doctors' patience and challenge their authority?-
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2006 Cambridge University Press. Deposited with reference to the publisher's archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.-
dc.titleThe Need for Informed Consent - Lessons from the Ancient Greeksen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S096318010606018X-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-2147-
dc.description.statusPeer reviewed-
dc.description.versionPublisher Version-
dc.relation.raeRAE 2007-
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3076_revised.pdf623.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.