Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Heart failure patients' illness representations and attitudes towards medication in a specialist nursing intervention
Authors: Swain, Elizabeth
Award date: 2004
Presented at: University of Leicester
Abstract: Objectives: To examine the impact of a specialist nursing intervention upon the illness representations, self-reported medication adherence, attitudes towards medication and psychological morbidity of heart failure patients. Design: A longitudinal study following a cohort of community based participants who had been previously hospitalised with heart failure over a three month time interval. Method: A total of 28 heart failure patients participated in the study. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire, the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS), the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire-General Version (BMQ-G), the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire-Specific Version (BMQ-S), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Significant Others Scale-Form B (SOS-B) at two interviews. Comparisons of data within the group at the two time points were undertaken. Results: Analysis revealed no statistically significant differences within the group from time one to time two of the nursing intervention in illness representation, self reported medication adherence, attitudes towards medication or physiological morbidity. The exception to this was a significant difference on the BMQ-S subscale, necessity. Between time one and time two participants' beliefs in the necessity of their medication had significantly reduced. Conclusions: Whilst specialist nursing interventions have significantly reduced hospital readmissions, no significant psychological impact of this programme was detected. The potential reasons for the lack of significant results as well as the clinical implications of the findings are explored. The value of routine assessment of psychological morbidity in this population is discussed.
Type: Thesis
Level: Doctoral
Qualification: DClinPsy
Rights: Copyright © the author. All rights reserved.
Appears in Collections:Theses, School of Psychology
Leicester Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
U211645.pdf4.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.