Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Responsibility to Report: the politics of British press reporting of the Darfur humanitarian crisis|
Armstrong, C. D.
|Citation:||Global Media and Communication, 2014, 10 (2), pp. 193-219 (27)|
|Abstract:||This article aims to establish whether the news media adopt a responsibility to report when covering humanitarian crises. It explores British press coverage of the genocide in Darfur and finds that the British press maintains traditional and ethnocentric frameworks that undermine the need for responsible reporting. Ultimately, the news values of negativity, elite people and elite nations have determined coverage of the Darfur crisis, and official and Western sources have been used to maintain credibility and a sense of identification with the domestic setting. Geopolitical biases continue to determine what stories are newsworthy, and political context remains scant. Sparse use of foreign correspondents and meagre inclusion of personal experiences suggest that journalists remain detached from the crisis, urging political rather than humanitarian intervention. This article concludes that the British press maintains institutionalised approaches to reporting humanitarian crises by avoiding attachment.|
|Rights:||© The Author(s) 2014 Archived with reference to SHERPA/RoMEO and publisher website. DOI: 10.1177/1742766514540980|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Media and Communication|
Files in This Item:
|Responsibility to report_OPEN ACCESS VERSION.pdf||Post-review (final submitted)||870.78 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.