Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Beliefs in being unlucky and deficits in executive functioning: An ERP Study.
Authors: Martin del Campo, Jaime
Fuggetta, Giorgio
Maltby, John
First Published: 19-Dec-2014
Publisher: PeerJ
Citation: PeerJ PrePrints 2:e733v1
Abstract: The present study tested the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis by examining whether deficits in the early stage of top down attentional control led to an increase of neural activity in later stages of response related selection process among those who thought themselves to be unlucky. Individuals with these beliefs were compared to a control group using an Event-Related Potential (ERP) measure assessing underlying neural activity of semantic inhibition while completing a Stroop test. Results showed stronger main interference effects in the former group, via greater reaction times and a more negative distributed scalp late ERP component during incongruent trials in the time window of 450 – 780 ms post stimulus onset. Further, less efficient maintenance of task set among the former group was associated with greater late ERP response-related activation to compensate for the lack of top-down attentional control. These findings provide electrophysiological evidence to support the Dysexecutive Luck hypothesis.
DOI Link: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.733v1
eISSN: 2167-9843
Version: Post-print
Type: Journal Article
Rights: CC-BY 4.0 Open Access
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.