Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A Comparative Study of Nickel Electrodeposition Using Deep Eutectic Solvents and Aqueous Solutions
Authors: Abbott, Andrew P.
Ballantyne, Andrew
Harris, Robert C.
Jumaa, Jamil A.
Rydera, Karl S.
Forrest, G.
First Published: 18-Jul-2015
Publisher: Elsevier for International Society of Electrochemistry (ISE), Pergamon
Citation: Electrochimica Acta, 2015, 176, pp. 718-726 (9)
Abstract: Metal electrodeposition using ionic liquid electrolytes and deep eutectic solvents is now well known but to our knowledge for electrolytic deposition of metals such as nickel no direct comparison has thus far been drawn between deposition using aqueous solutions and DES under otherwise identical conditions. In the current study it is shown that nickel deposition can be carried out with similar deposition rates in aqueous and ionic media despite the significant differences in viscosity and conductivity. It is, however, shown that in ionic media the morphology of the deposits is markedly different from that achieved using a Watts nickel bath and that one aspect of these differences manifests itself in significant increase in the coating hardness. It is proposed that the observed morphology differences occur due to the variations of nickel speciation in each electrolyte environment.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.051
ISSN: 1873-3859
Embargo on file until: 18-Jul-2017
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available after the end of the embargo period under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Description: The file associated with this record is under a 24-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy, available at The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Chemistry

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ElectrochimicaActa_2015_.pdfPost-review (final submitted)2.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.