Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Progressive Resistance Exercise Training in CKD: A Feasibility Study
Authors: Watson, Emma L.
Greening, Neil J.
Viana, J. L.
Aulakh, Jaspreet
Bodicoat, Danielle H.
Barratt, Jonathan
Feehally, John
Smith, Alice C.
First Published: 18-Dec-2014
Publisher: Elsevier for National Kidney Foundation
Citation: American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2015, 66 (2), pp. 249-257
Abstract: Background: Skeletal muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with morbidity and mortality. Resistance exercise results in muscle hypertrophy in the healthy population, but is underinvestigated in CKD. We aimed to determine the feasibility of delivering a supervised progressive resistance exercise program in CKD, with secondary aims to investigate effects on muscle size, strength, and physical functioning. Study Design: Parallel randomized controlled feasibility study. Setting & Participants: Patients with CKD stages 3b to 4 were randomly assigned to the exercise (n = 20; 11 men; median age, 63 [IQR, 57-65] years; median estimated glomerular filtration rate, 28.5 [IQR, 19.0-32.0] mL/min/1.73 m[superscript: 2]) or nonexercise control (n = 18; 14 men; median age, 66 [IQR, 45-79] years; estimated glomerular filtration rate, 20.5 [IQR, 16.0-26.0] mL/min/1.73 m[superscript: 2]) group. Intervention: Patients in the exercise group undertook an 8-week progressive resistance exercise program consisting of 3 sets of 10 to 12 leg extensions at 70% of estimated 1-repetition maximum thrice weekly. Patients in the control group continued with usual physical activity. Outcomes: Primary outcomes were related to study feasibility: eligibility, recruitment, retention, and adherence rates. Secondary outcomes were muscle anatomical cross-sectional area, muscle volume, pennation angle, knee extensor strength, and exercise capacity. Measurements Two- and 3-dimensional ultrasonography of skeletal muscle, dynamometry, and shuttle walk tests at baseline and 8 weeks. Results: Of 2,349 patients screened, 403 were identified as eligible and 38 enrolled in the study. 33 (87%) completed the study, and those in the exercise group attended 92% of training sessions. No changes were seen in controls for any parameter. Progressive resistance exercise increased muscle anatomical cross-sectional area, muscle volume, knee extensor strength, and exercise capacity. Limitations: No blinded assessors, magnetic resonance imaging not used to assess muscle mass, lack of a healthy control group. Conclusions: This type of exercise is well tolerated by patients with CKD and confers important clinical benefits; however, low recruitment rates suggest that a supervised outpatient-based program is not the most practical implementation strategy.
DOI Link: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.10.019
ISSN: 0272-6386
eISSN: 1523-6838
Version: Pre-print
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
KI submission Watson et al 2014.pdfPre-review (submitted draft)338.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.