Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/32928
Title: Beyond metrics? Utilizing ‘soft intelligence’ for healthcare quality and safety
Authors: Martin, Graham P.
McKee, L.
Dixon-Woods, Mary
First Published: 31-Jul-2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Social Science & Medicine, 2015 (In press, accepted manuscript)
Abstract: Formal metrics for monitoring the quality and safety of healthcare have a valuable role, but may not, by themselves, yield full insight into the range of fallibilities in organizations. ‘Soft intelligence’ is usefully understood as the processes and behaviours associated with seeking and interpreting soft data—of the kind that evade easy capture, straightforward classification and simple quantification—to produce forms of knowledge that can provide the basis for intervention. With the aim of examining current and potential practice in relation to soft intelligence, we conducted and analysed 107 in-depth qualitative interviews with senior leaders, including managers and clinicians, involved in healthcare quality and safety in the English National Health Service. We found that participants were in little doubt about the value of softer forms of data, especially for their role in revealing troubling issues that might be obscured by conventional metrics. Their struggles lay in how to access softer data and turn them into a useful form of knowing. Some of the dominant approaches they used risked replicating the limitations of hard, quantitative data. They relied on processes of aggregation and triangulation that prioritised reliability, or on instrumental use of soft data to animate the metrics. The unpredictable, untameable, spontaneous quality of soft data could be lost in efforts to systematize their collection and interpretation to render them more tractable. A more challenging but potentially rewarding approach involved processes and behaviours aimed at disrupting taken-for-granted assumptions about quality, safety, and organizational performance. This approach, which explicitly values the seeking out and the hearing of multiple voices, is consistent with conceptual frameworks of organizational sensemaking and dialogical understandings of knowledge. Using soft intelligence this way can be challenging and discomfiting, but may offer a critical defence against the complacency that can precede crisis.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.027
ISSN: 0277-9536
Links: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953615300435
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/32928
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
QSN - PAPERS - Soft intelligence paper - 20150723 final version.docxPost-review (final submitted)82.4 kBUnknownView/Open
QSN - PAPERS - Soft intelligence paper - 20150723 final version.pdfPost-review (final submitted)317.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.