Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Consumer Dispute Resolution Goes Online: Reflections on the Evolution of European Law for Out-Of-Court Redress
Authors: Cortés, Pablo
Lodder, Arno
First Published: 2014
Publisher: Intersentia
Citation: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2015, 21 (1), pp. 14-38
Abstract: In this paper we discuss if and to what extent the 2013 EU Regulation on consumer online dispute resolution (ODR) in tandem with the EU Directive on consumer alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is likely to finally fulfil the expectations of ODR that policy makers and academics have had for many years. Part 1 examines the reasons why ODR has not yet taken off . Part 2 discusses previous EU initiatives that aimed to promote the use of ADR and ODR. Part 3 briefly examines the Directive on consumer ADR and the Regulation on consumer ODR, and it compares the EU approach with the UNCITRAL draft rules on ODR. Finally, Part 4 evaluates the obstacles faced in the implementation of the EU ODR Platform, and calls for the embedding of incentives in its operation, the provision of an online negotiation tool, a connection to small claims processes, and the incorporation of adequate tools to overcome language barriers.
ISSN: 1023-263X
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2014, Intersentia. All rights reserved. Archived with express permission by the publisher.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MJ_21_01_0014.pdfPublished (publisher PDF)831.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.