Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/33327
Title: Children’s claims to knowledge regarding their mental health experiences and practitioners’ negotiation of the problem
Authors: O'Reilly, Michelle J.
Lester, J.
Mukett, T.
First Published: 15-Oct-2015
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Patient Education and Counseling, 2015 (In press)
Abstract: Objective : The objective was to identify how children knowledge positions were negotiated in child mental health assessments and how this was managed by the different parties. Methods : The child psychiatry data consisted of 28 video - recorded assessments. A conversation analysis was undertaken to examine the interactional detail between the children, parents , and practitioners. Results : The findings indicated that claims to knowledge were managed in three ways. First, practitioners positioned children as ‘experts’ on their own health and this was sometimes accepted. Second, some children resisted this epistemic position, claiming not to have the relevant knowledge. Third, some children’s claims to knowledge were negotiated and sometimes contested by adult parties who questioned their competence to share relevant information about their lives in accordance with the assessment agenda . Conclusion : Through question design, the practitioner was able to position the child as holding relevant knowledge regard ing their situation. The child was able to take up this position or resist it in various ways . Practice implications : This has important implications for debates regarding children’s competence to contribute to mental health interventions. Children are often treated as agents with limited knowledge, yet in the mental health assessment they are directly questioned about their own lives.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.005
ISSN: 1873-5134
Links: http://www.pec-journal.com/article/S0738-3991%2815%2930085-9/abstract
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/33327
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2015, Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available after the end of the embargo period under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description: The file associated with this record is under a 12-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy, available at http://www.elsevier.com/about/company-information/policies/sharing. The full text may be available in the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Paper on epistemics - FINAL VERSION - October 2015.docxPost-review (final submitted)76.12 kBUnknownView/Open
Paper on epistemics - FINAL VERSION - October 2015.pdfPost-review (final submitted)398.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.