Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/33480
Title: Complaining against Medical Practice and Practitioners: The Patient View, 1830s-1900
Authors: King, Steven A.
First Published: 16-Dec-2014
Number of Pieces: 11
Publisher: Routledge
Citation: King, S. A. , Complaining against Medical Practice and Practitioners: The Patient View, 1830s-1900, ed. Reinarz, J;Wynter, R, 'Complaints, Controversies and Grievances in Medicine: Historical and Social Science Perspectives', Routledge, 2014, pp. 112-148 (36)
Abstract: The nature of the relationship between a doctor and his middling and aristocratic patients in the nineteenth century is now well-established. In a medical market where cure was often elusive the role and aspiration of the doctor was as much socio-cultural as medical. Moneyed patients with plenty of choice and the knowledge and desire to execute it demanded prompt personal and written attention, easy financial terms and (notwithstanding a wider sense of the disappearance of the patient narrative) an active role in what modern medical professionals would label a care package. 1Local Medical Societies helped to create a collective identity amongst doctors and a wider movement to professionalisation after the early nineteenth century gave energy to the identification and confrontation of otherness (quacks, irregular practitioners, female practitioners), though it was not until the later nineteenth century that the need for formal qualifications and the professional oversight of doctoring activity reached a par with that exercised by and over the apothecaries since 1815. 2 Against this backdrop, a false step or an inability to play the holistic role of the doctor led either to a failure to get established or to socio-economic ruin. [First Paragraph]
ISBN: 9781138794900
Links: https://www.routledge.com/products/9781138794900
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/33480
Embargo on file until: 1-Jan-10000
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Chapter
Rights: Copyright © 2014, Routledge. All rights reserved.
Description: The file associated with this record is under an 18-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Books & Book Chapters, School of Historical Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Complaint.docxPost-review (final submitted)55.27 kBUnknownView/Open
Complaint.pdfPost-review (final submitted)278.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.