Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/3372
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLowy, Adam-
dc.contributor.authorWillis, Diane-
dc.contributor.authorAbrams, Keith R.-
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-14T12:18:42Z-
dc.date.available2008-01-14T12:18:42Z-
dc.date.issued1997-08-16-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ, 1997, 315, pp.406-408en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/3372-
dc.descriptionAlso available from www.bmj.comen_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBritish Medical Associationen_GB
dc.titleIs histological examination of tissue removed by general practitioners always necessary? Before and after comparison of detection rates of serious skin lesionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
406.pdf220.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.