Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Hybridisation, Personalisation and Tribuneship in the Political Interview
Authors: Hutchby, Ian
First Published: 9-Jul-2016
Publisher: SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Citation: Journalism, 2017, 18(1), 101-118
Abstract: This article presents a comparative analysis of political interviewing in the contemporary environment of broadcast news. Beginning from a conversation analytic perspective, four types of political interview programme are described in terms of their different approaches to questions and answers; opinions and arguments; and neutrality, agency and advocacy. The analysis then turns to the different ways in which 'tribuneship' is manifested in different types of interview, comparing the representation of the public interest as found in both neutralistic and adversarial interviewing with the type of personalised and 'non-neutral' tribuneship found in hybrid political interviews.
DOI Link: 10.1177/1464884916657528
ISSN: 1464-8849
eISSN: 1741-3001
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2017, the authors. Licensee: SAGE. Reprints and permissions: Deposited on acceptance for publication with reference to the Publisher's green Open Access policy, available at
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Sociology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hybridisation and Tribuneship.pdfPost-review (final submitted)370.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.