Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/36071
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, Scott Vincent-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-15T12:13:31Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-24T02:45:04Z-
dc.date.issued2014-03-24-
dc.identifier.citationPublic Relations Review, 2014, 41(5), pp. 615–627en
dc.identifier.issn0363-8111-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811114000514en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2381/36071-
dc.descriptionThe file associated with this record is under a 36-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy, available at http://www.elsevier.com/about/company-information/policies/sharing. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.en
dc.description.abstractPublic affairs and lobbying is a high status and strategically vital public relations specialism. It is a field of PR practice that generates high levels of both scholarly and public concern in regard to its perceived role in supporting corporate power and the associated impact on the functional legitimacy of democratic institutions. For this paper a content analysis was conducted of academic journals (between 2000 and 2013) to provide insights into how public affairs and lobbying have been theorised and researched within public relations scholarship and to ascertain to what degree wider public concerns have been addressed. Findings include an empirical confirmation of the low level of research activity on public affairs; that stakeholder and rhetorical theories have been the most widely used theories, but are far from constituting dominant paradigms; that scholarship has privileged functional objectives over civic concerns; and that published work originates almost entirely from institutions in Europe and the US with the Global South invisible. The paper also discusses future directions for research in public affairs and advocates the placing of discourse into definitions of public affairs, and that academic public relations should assert responsibility for this field, but in a manner that more equitably balances organisational and societal concerns. © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsCopyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript version is made available after the end of the embargo period under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectCampaignsen
dc.subjectDiscourseen
dc.subjectLobbyingen
dc.subjectPublic affairsen
dc.subjectPublic relations theoryen
dc.subjectRelationshipsen
dc.titleEverywhere and nowhere: Theorising and researching public affairs and lobbying within public relations scholarshipen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.023-
dc.identifier.piiS0363811114000514-
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.description.versionPost-printen
dc.type.subtypeArticle in Press-
pubs.organisational-group/Organisationen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIESen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Media and Communicationen
dc.dateaccepted2014-02-21-
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Media and Communication

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Davidson_PRR_everywhere and nowhere.pdfPost-review (final submitted)372.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.