Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWorden, J. R.-
dc.contributor.authorTurner, A. J.-
dc.contributor.authorBloom, A.-
dc.contributor.authorKulawik, S. S.-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, M.-
dc.contributor.authorWeidner, R.-
dc.contributor.authorBowman, K.-
dc.contributor.authorFrankenberg, C.-
dc.contributor.authorParker, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorPayne, V. H.-
dc.identifier.citationAtmospheric Measurements Techniques, 2015, 8 (8), pp. 3433-3445 (13)en
dc.description.abstractEvaluating surface fluxes of CH[Subscript: 4] using total column data requires models to accurately account for the transport and chemistry of methane in the free troposphere and stratosphere, thus reducing sensitivity to the underlying fluxes. Vertical profiles of methane have increased sensitivity to surface fluxes because lower tropospheric methane is more sensitive to surface fluxes than a total column, and quantifying free-tropospheric CH[Subscript: 4] concentrations helps to evaluate the impact of transport and chemistry uncertainties on estimated surface fluxes. Here we demonstrate the potential for estimating lower tropospheric CH[Subscript: 4] concentrations through the combination of free-tropospheric methane measurements from the Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) and XCH[Subscript: 4] (dry-mole air fraction of methane) from the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite – Thermal And Near-infrared for carbon Observation (GOSAT TANSO, herein GOSAT for brevity). The calculated precision of these estimates ranges from 10 to 30 ppb for a monthly average on a 4° × 5° latitude/longitude grid making these data suitable for evaluating lower-tropospheric methane concentrations. Smoothing error is approximately 10 ppb or less. Comparisons between these data and the GEOS-Chem model demonstrate that these lower-tropospheric CH[Subscript: 4] estimates can resolve enhanced concentrations over flux regions that are challenging to resolve with total column measurements. We also use the GEOS-Chem model and surface measurements in background regions across a range of latitudes to determine that these lower-tropospheric estimates are biased low by approximately 65 ppb, with an accuracy of approximately 6 ppb (after removal of the bias) and an actual precision of approximately 30 ppb. This 6 ppb accuracy is consistent with the accuracy of TES and GOSAT methane retrievals.en
dc.publisherCopernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Unionen
dc.rightsCopyright © Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.subjectScience & Technologyen
dc.subjectPhysical Sciencesen
dc.subjectMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciencesen
dc.subjectATMOSPHERIC CO2en
dc.subjectAURA TESen
dc.titleQuantifying lower tropospheric methane concentrations using GOSAT near-IR and TES thermal IR measurementsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.description.versionPublisher Versionen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERINGen
pubs.organisational-group/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/Department of Physics and Astronomyen
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
amt-8-3433-2015.pdfPublished (publisher PDF)1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.