Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers|
Paterson, Kevin B.
Liversedge, S. P.
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis (Routledge): STM|
|Citation:||Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 2015, pp. 1-17|
|Abstract:||Research using alphabetic languages shows that, compared to young adults, older adults employ a risky reading strategy in which they are more likely to guess word identities and skip words to compensate for their slower processing of text. However, little is known about how ageing affects reading behaviour for naturally unspaced, logographic languages like Chinese. Accordingly, to assess the generality of age-related changes in reading strategy across different writing systems we undertook an eye movement investigation of adult age differences in Chinese reading. Participants read sentences containing a target word (a single Chinese character) that had a high or low frequency of usage and was constructed from either few or many character strokes, and so either visually simple or complex. Frequency and complexity produced similar patterns of influence for both age groups on skipping rates and fixation times for target words. Both groups therefore demonstrated sensitivity to these manipulations. But compared to the young adults, the older adults made more and longer fixations and more forward and backward eye movements overall. They also fixated the target words for longer, especially when these were visually complex. Crucially, the older adults skipped words less and made shorter progressive saccades. Therefore, in contrast with findings for alphabetic languages, older Chinese readers appear to use a careful reading strategy according to which they move their eyes cautiously along lines of text and skip words infrequently. We propose they use this more careful reading strategy to compensate for increased difficulty processing word boundaries in Chinese.|
|Embargo on file until:||27-Apr-2017|
|Rights:||Copyright © 2015 The Experimental Psychology Society. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology on 27 Oct 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470218.2015.1083594|
|Description:||The file associated with this record is under an 18-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy, available at http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/sharing-your-work/. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour|
Files in This Item:
|Zang-et-al-QJEP.docx||Post-review (final submitted)||580.73 kB||Unknown||View/Open|
|Zang-et-al-QJEP.pdf||Post-review (final submitted)||391.59 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.