Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Partisan, scholarly and active: arguments for an organic public sociology of work
Authors: Brook, Paul Anthony
Darlington, R.
First Published: 27-Feb-2013
Publisher: SAGE Publications (UK and US)
Citation: Work, Employment and Society, 2013, 27 (2), pp. 232-243 (12)
Abstract: Despite a thriving tradition of critical scholarship in United Kingdom-based sociology of work, Burawoy’s call for a partisan organic public sociology that is part of ‘a social movement beyond the academy’ and Bourdieu’s plea for committed scholarship in the service of the social movement against neo-liberalism have received scant attention. This article seeks to stimulate debate by presenting a framework for a left-radical organic public sociology of work based on Gramsci’s concept of the connected organic intellectual rather than Bourdieu’s expert committed scholar. The latter, it is argued, is ultimately incompatible with activist partisan scholarship based on democratized relations between researchers and researched. Participatory action research is offered as a methodological orientation that underpins and enables organic scholars of work to engage actively with the marginalized and labour in the co-creation of knowledge that aids their struggles for change.
DOI Link: 10.1177/0950017012461838
ISSN: 0950-0170
eISSN: 1469-8722
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2013, the authors. Licensee: SAGE. Reprints and permissions: Deposited with reference to the publisher’s archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Management

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WES Partisan, Scholarly and Active (final) 2013.pdfPost-review (final submitted)421.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
WES Partisanship (final) 2012.docxPost-review (final submitted)58.95 kBUnknownView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.