Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Role of serum biomarkers in the prediction of outcome in women with threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis|
|Authors:||Pillai, Rekha N.|
Konje, Justin C.
Tincello, Douglas Gordon
|Publisher:||Oxford University Press (OUP) for European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology|
|Citation:||Human Reproduction Update, 2015 (Published before print)|
|Abstract:||BACKGROUND: Threatened miscarriage affects one in five women and is associated with significant emotional distress. The uncertainty around the prognosis of threatened miscarriage makes it equally challenging to the healthcare professionals. Various biochemical markers have been investigated in the past to predict the outcome of threatened miscarriage; however, the results have been conflicting. Therefore, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of biochemical markers in predicting the outcome in women presenting with threatened miscarriage. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies that investigated biochemical markers to determine outcomes for women with threatened miscarriage at 5-23 weeks gestational age. Electronic databases were searched up to June 2015 and study quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2: A Revised Tool) for evaluating the diagnostic accuracy studies. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cochrane systematic review software. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included in the qualitative data synthesis of which 15 (including 1263 women) were eligible for the meta-analysis. The review highlights the role of biochemical markers serum progesterone, hCG, pregnancy associated plasma protein A, estradiol and cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) in the prediction of outcome in women with threatened miscarriage. Interestingly, serum CA 125 appears to be the most promising marker (n = 648 women in seven studies), whereas serum progesterone and hCG are less useful once fetal viability is established. The summary receiver operating characteristics for CA 125 showed a sensitivity of 90% (95% confidence interval (CI) 83-94%), specificity of 88% (95% CI 79-93%), positive likelihood ratio of 7.86 (95% CI 4.23-14.60) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (95% CI 0.06-0.20). The inverse of negative likelihood ratio was 9.31 (95% CI 5-17.1) indicating that a negative test is likely to identify those who are likely to continue with the pregnancy. Serum estradiol was the next best marker with a sensitivity of 45% (95% CI 6-90%), a specificity of 87% (95% CI 81-92%), a positive likelihood ratio of 3.72 (95% CI 1.01-13.71) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.62 (95% CI 0.20-1.84). CONCLUSIONS: In women with threatened miscarriage, serum CA 125 has high predictive value in identifying pregnancies that are 'likely to continue', whereas the most commonly used biomarkers of serum hCG and progesterone are not useful in predicting outcome of a pregnancy with a viable fetus. Other markers such as inhibin A and a combination of markers need to be investigated to hopefully improve the prediction of outcome in women with threatened miscarriage.|
|Embargo on file until:||9-Dec-2016|
|Rights:||Copyright © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: email@example.com. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Human Reproduction Update following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Hum. Reprod. Update (2015) is available online at: dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv054|
|Description:||The file associated with this record is under a 12-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences|
Files in This Item:
|Serum markers Hum Reprod 2016.docx||Post-review (final submitted)||1.62 MB||Unknown||View/Open|
|Serum markers Hum Reprod 2016.pdf||Post-review (final submitted)||817.99 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.