Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/36878
Title: Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: long-term follow-up of endovascular versus open repair
Authors: Piffaretti, G.
Mariscalco, Giovanni
Riva, F.
Fontana, F.
Carrafiello, G.
Castelli, P.
First Published: 12-May-2014
Publisher: Termedia Publishing House
Citation: Archives of Medical Science, 2014, 10 (2), pp. 273-282
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: To compare early and long-term outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open repair (OPEN). DESIGN: Prospective observational, per protocol, non-randomized, with retrospective analyses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2000 and 2005, a total of 311 patients having EVAR or OPEN repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were identified and included in this prospective single-center observational study. A propensity score-based optimal-matching algorithm was employed, and 138 patients undergoing EVAR procedures were matched (1: 1) to OPEN repair. RESULTS: Open repair showed higher hospital mortality (17% vs. 6%, p = 0.004), respiratory failure (p < 0.026), transfusion requirement (p < 0.001), and intensive care unit admission (27% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), and longer hospitalization (p < 0.001). Median follow-up was 70 months (25(th) to 75(th) percentile, 24 to 101). Actuarial survival estimates at 1, 5 and 10 years were 93%, 74%, 49% for the OPEN group compared to 89%, 69%, 59% for the EVAR group (p = 0.465). A significant difference between groups was observed in younger patients (< 75 years) only (p < 0.044). Late complication and re-intervention rates were significantly higher in EVAR patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Freedom from late complications at 1, 5 and 10 years was 96%, 92%, 86%, and 84%, 70%, 64% for OPEN and EVAR procedures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms the excellent results of the EVAR procedures, offering excellent early and long-term results in terms of safety and reduction of mortality. Patients < 75 years seem to benefit from EVAR not only in the immediate postoperative period but even in a long-term perspective.
DOI Link: 10.5114/aoms.2014.42579
ISSN: 1734-1922
eISSN: 1896-9151
Links: http://www.termedia.pl/Journal/-19/Streszczenie-22708
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/36878
Version: Publisher Version
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2016 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: long-term follow-up of endovascular versus open repair..pdfPublished (publisher PDF)108.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.