Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/38306
Title: Comparison of the effectiveness of repeated injections of onabotulinum toxin A for refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity: analysis of an open label extension of a randomized trial (the RELAX study)
Authors: Owen, Rhiannon K.
Abrams, Keith R.
Mayne, Christopher
Slack, Mark
Tincello, Douglas G.
First Published: 26-Aug-2016
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Neurourol Urodyn, 2016, in press
Abstract: AIMS: To assess effects of repeat treatment with onabotulinumtoxin A (onaBoNT-A) in women with refractory idiopathic detrusor overactivity (DO). METHODS: Analysis of an open-label extension study of a large randomized placebo controlled trial of onaBoNT-A. Participants had been randomized to receive 200 IU onaBoNTA or placebo and were offered up to two further onaBoNTA injections over a 5-year period. For this analysis, the primary outcome was duration of treatment effect by patient-reported symptom return. Weibull proportional hazards regression models were fitted in a Bayesian framework to estimate missing times. Multivariable hazard regression analysis (hazard ratio, 95% credible intervals (HR, 95% CrI) compared repeated injections adjusting for differences in baseline symptom severity. Secondary outcomes included inter-injection interval, incontinence, urgency, and voiding episodes 6 weeks after injection. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-two active injections were administered: 228 patients had one, 155 had two, and 59 had three injections. Time to symptom return for injection number 1 and 2 was 84 (95%CI: 63, 112) and 180 (95%CI: 135, 223) days, respectively. Median inter-injection intervals for receiving second and third injection were 266 days (range: 130, 1400) and 372 days (range: 134, 1283). No statistically significant differences in symptom outcomes or time to symptom return (HR 0.88, 95% CrI 0.37, 2.07 for injection 2, HR 0.33, 95% CrI 0.09, 1.03 for injection 3) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated onaBoNT-A injections have consistent efficacy and duration of action. There appears to be long-term placebo effects in both groups of randomized patients, with implications for open-label extension studies.
DOI Link: 10.1002/nau.23095
ISSN: 0733-2467
eISSN: 1520-6777
Links: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nau.23095/abstract
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/38306
Embargo on file until: 26-Aug-2017
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2016, Wiley. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy.
Description: The file associated with this record is under a 12 month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Repeated injections manuscript revised clean.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)547.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.