Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/38427
Title: Use or abuse? A qualitative study of physicians’ views on use of observation stays at three hospitals in the United States and England
Authors: Martin, Graham P.
Wright, Brad
Ahmed, Azeemuddin
Banerjee, Jay
Mason, Suzanne
Roland, Damian
First Published: 23-Nov-2016
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2016, 69(3), pp. 284–292.e2
Abstract: Objective: Accumulating evidence has seen increasing use of observation stays for patients presenting to EDs requiring diagnostic workup or time-limited treatment plans, but critics suggest that this expansion arises from hospitals’ concerns to maximize revenue, and shifts costs to patients. Perspectives of physicians making decisions to admit, observe or discharge have been absent from the debate. We examined the views of emergency physicians in the US and England on observation stays, and what influences their decisions to use observation services. Methods: We undertook in-depth, qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of physicians in three hospitals across the two countries, and analyzed these using an approach based on the constantcomparison method. Limitations include the number of sites, whose characteristics are not generalizable to all institutions, and the reliance on self-reported interview accounts. Results: Physicians used observation status for the specific presentations for which it is well-evidenced, but acknowledged administrative and financial considerations in their decision making. They also highlighted an important role for observation not described in the literature: as a ‘safe space’, relatively immune from the administrative gaze, where diagnostic uncertainties, socio-medical problems and medico-legal challenges could be contained. Conclusions: Observation status increases the options available to admitting physicians in a way that they valued for its potential benefits to patient safety and quality of care, but some of these have been neglected in the literature to date. Reform to observation status should address these important but previously unacknowledged functions.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.458
ISSN: 196-0644
eISSN: 1097-6760
Links: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064416309362
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/38427
Embargo on file until: 23-Nov-2017
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2016, Elsevier. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy
Description: The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Observation care paper 20160902 for LRA.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)456.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.