Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/38774
Title: Developing the ‘GRIPES’ tool for junior doctors to report concerns: a pilot study.
Authors: Carr, S.
Mukherjee, T.
Montgomery, A.
Durbridge, M.
Tarrant, C.
First Published: 29-Sep-2016
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: Pilot & Feasibility Studies 2016 2:60
Abstract: Background Junior doctors often have concerns about quality and safety but show low levels of engagement with incident reporting systems. We aimed to develop and pilot a web-based reporting tool for junior doctors to proactively report concerns about quality and safety of care, and optimise it for future use. Methods We developed the gripes tool with input from junior doctors and piloted it at a large UK teaching hospital trust. We evaluated the tool through an analysis of concerns reported over a 3-month pilot period, and through interviews with five stakeholders and two focus groups with medical students and junior doctors about their views of the tool. Results Junior doctors reported 111 concerns during piloting, including a number of problems previously unknown to the trust. Junior doctors felt the tool was easy to use and encouraged them to report. Barriers to engagement included lack of motivation of junior doctors to report concerns, and fear of repercussions. Ensuring transparency about who would see reported concerns, and providing feedback across whole cohorts of junior doctors about concerns raised and how these had been addressed to improve patient safety at the trust, were seen having the potential to mitigate against these barriers. Sustainability of the tool was seen as requiring a revised model of staffing to share the load for responding to concerns and ongoing efforts to integrate the tool and data with other local systems for gathering intelligence about risks and incidents. Following piloting the trust committed to continuing to operate the gripes tool on an ongoing basis. Conclusions The gripes tool has the potential to enable trusts to proactively monitor and address risks to patient safety, but sustainability is likely to be dependent on organisational commitment to staffing the system and perceptions of added value over the longer term.
DOI Link: 10.1186/s40814-016-0100-0
eISSN: 2055-5784
Links: https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-016-0100-0
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/38774
Version: Publisher Version
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Description: Additional file 1: TIDieR checklist for the gripes intervention. (DOCX 47 kb) https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40814-016-0100-0/MediaObjects/40814_2016_100_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art%3A10.1186%2Fs40814-016-0100-0.pdfPublished (publisher PDF)530.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.