Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39063
Title: European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia.
Authors: Lucas, J. S.
Barbato, A.
Collins, S. A.
Goutaki, M.
Behan, L.
Caudri, D.
Dell, S.
Eber, E.
Escudier, E.
Hirst, Robert
Hogg, C.
Jorissen, M.
Latzin, P.
Legendre, M.
Leigh, M. W.
Midulla, F.
Nielsen, K. G.
Omran, H.
Papon, J. F.
Pohunek, P.
Redfern, B.
Rigau, D.
Rindlisbacher, B.
Santamaria, F.
Shoemark, A.
Snijders, D.
Tonia, T.
Titieni, A.
Walker, W. T.
Werner, C.
Bush, A.
Kuehni, C. E.
First Published: 11-Nov-2016
Publisher: European Respiratory Society: ERJ, Wiley
Citation: European Respiratory Journal, 2016
Abstract: The diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia is often confirmed with standard, albeit complex and expensive, tests. In many cases, however, the diagnosis remains difficult despite the array of sophisticated diagnostic tests. There is no "gold standard" reference test. Hence, a Task Force supported by the European Respiratory Society has developed this guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations on diagnostic testing, especially in light of new developments in such tests, and the need for robust diagnoses of patients who might enter randomised controlled trials of treatments. The guideline is based on pre-defined questions relevant for clinical care, a systematic review of the literature, and assessment of the evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. It focuses on clinical presentation, nasal nitric oxide, analysis of ciliary beat frequency and pattern by high-speed video-microscopy analysis, transmission electron microscopy, genotyping and immunofluorescence. It then used a modified Delphi survey to develop an algorithm for the use of diagnostic tests to definitively confirm and exclude the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia; and to provide advice when the diagnosis was not conclusive. Finally, this guideline proposes a set of quality criteria for future research on the validity of diagnostic methods for primary ciliary dyskinesia.
DOI Link: 10.1183/13993003.01090-2016
ISSN: 0903-1936
eISSN: 1399-3003
Links: http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/early/2016/11/11/13993003.01090-2016
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39063
Embargo on file until: 11-May-2018
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Creative Commons “Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives” licence CC BY-NC-ND, further details of which can be found via the following link: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Archived with reference to SHERPA/RoMEO and publisher website.
Description: This article has supplementary material available from erj.ersjournals.com
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ERS PCD review 2016.pdfPost-print4.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.