Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39155
Title: OTC Derivatives Regulation in China: how far across the river?
Authors: Hsiao, Mark
First Published: 3-Feb-2014
Publisher: Thomson Reuters (Professional) for Lawbook
Citation: Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, 2014, 25 (1)
Abstract: In 2011, China revised its prudential regulation on the derivatives activities of financial institutions as a result of the global financial crisis. This paper considers how prudential regulation, supervision of conduct and requirements that limit risk-taking are used to achieve policy objectives in the context of regulating derivatives in China. This is particularly pertinent in the case of China, where financial institutions were formerly state-owned enterprises. These objectives are closely related to defining the legitimate purpose of contracts which are used to hedge default risk of credit assets owned by financial institutions. The paper also considers the legal aspects of the executory contract arising from the legal transplant of the ISDA Master Agreement 2002 into China in the form of NAFMII Documents, and the way in which the Contract Law 1999 (CL) and the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law 2006 (EBL) interact to offer a solution to the issue. Finally, the paper offers an explanation of existing Chinese central counterparty (CCP) and finality orders in clearing and settlement systems for possible alignment with international recommendations on OTC derivatives regulation at Pittsburgh in 2009.
ISSN: 1034-3040
Links: http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/category/journals/journal-of-banking-and-finance-law-and-practice/
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39155
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Creative Commons “Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives” licence CC BY-NC-ND, further details of which can be found via the following link: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Archived with reference to SHERPA/RoMEO and publisher website.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, School of Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MH_JBFLP (2014).pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)164.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.