Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Minimising the impact of errors in the interpretation of CT images for surveillance and evaluation of therapy in cancer.|
Stephenson, J. A.
|Publisher:||WB Saunders for Royal College of Radiologists|
|Citation:||Clinical Radiology, 2016, 71 (11), pp. 1083-1094|
|Abstract:||Radiological error is inevitable and usually multifactorial. Error can be secondary to radiologist-specific causes, including cognitive and perceptive errors or ambiguity of report, or system-related causes, including inadequate, misleading, or incorrect clinical information, poor imaging technique, excessive workload, and poor working conditions. In this paper, we discuss a systematic approach to reduce errors in oncological radiology reporting, thus reducing risk to the patient. Rather than attempt to discuss all types of error, we concentrate on the most important and commonly occurring errors that we have encountered over 20 years of practice, based on weekly discrepancy reviews of our practice and independent reviews of clinical and research imaging from other institutions. This review focuses on computed tomography (CT) reporting for staging, surveillance, and response assessment of cancer patients, but the messages apply to all imaging methods.|
|Rights:||Creative Commons “Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives” licence CC BY-NC-ND, further details of which can be found via the following link: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Archived with reference to SHERPA/RoMEO and publisher website.|
|Description:||12 month embargo|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Cancer Studies and Molecular Medicine|
Files in This Item:
|Morgan_clinRad_IRIS.pdf||Post-review (final submitted author manuscript)||1.16 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.