Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39399
Title: “Religious Nones” in the United Kingdom: How Atheists and Agnostics Think about Religion and Politics
Authors: Clements, Ben
Gries, Peter
First Published: 20-Dec-2016
Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Citation: Politics and Religion, 2017, 10 (1), pp. 1-25
Abstract: The decline in religious identification and corresponding increase in the unaffiliated has been one of the most important religious changes in the United Kingdom (UK). The emergence of the “religious nones” is the most obvious sign of continuing secularization and the declining social and cultural relevance of religion. Yet while the religiously-unaffiliated often form the plurality — if not sometimes the majority — in many surveys, there has been little scholarly investigation into atheists, agnostics, and others who do not identify with a particular religion. This article uses a 2014 survey of UK adults to examine how those who identify as atheist or agnostic differ from the religiously-affiliated in terms of religiosity, ideology, and policy preferences. Findings reveal secular groups in the UK to be more to the ideological left than the religiously affiliated, and that atheists and agnostics differ from each other and especially the religiously affiliated on public policy.
DOI Link: 10.1017/S175504831600078X
ISSN: 1755-0483
eISSN: 1755-0491
Links: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/div-classtitlereligious-nones-in-the-united-kingdom-how-atheists-and-agnostics-think-about-religion-and-politicsdiv/6A1FC1367FF84CDBB4EAF99047F0CDDE
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39399
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2017, Cambridge University Press (CUP). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s archiving policy available on the SHERPA/RoMEO website.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Politics and International Relations

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Clements and Gries (Checked by authors).pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)268.61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.