Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Is one innovation enough? Leaders, covariation and language change|
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
|Publisher:||Duke University Press for American Dialect Society|
|Citation:||American Speech, 2017, 92(1), pp. 23-40|
|Abstract:||Do the people who lead in one linguistic change, lead in others? Previous work has suggested that they do not, but the topic has not been addressed extensively with non-phonological, spoken data. In this paper, we answer this question through an examination of lexical, morphosyntactic and discourse-pragmatic changes in progress in Canadian English as spoken in the largest urban center of the country, Toronto. Close scrutiny of the behavior of individuals across multiple linguistic variables, i.e. covariation, and using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient enables us to test the use of incoming variants both by the community of speakers as a whole and by those who are leading change. The innovative variants of quotatives, i.e. be like, intensifiers, i.e. really, so, deontic modality, i.e. have to, stative possession, i.e. have and general extenders, i.e. and stuff, demonstrate that the leaders of these multiple linguistic changes have common social characteristics (e.g. women lead more than one change), but it is not the case that any one individual in a community will be at the forefront of more than one change.|
|Rights:||Copyright © 2017, Duke University Press for American Dialect Society. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of English|
Files in This Item:
|Waters-Tagliamonte_OA Upload.docx||Post-review (final submitted author manuscript)||61.1 kB||Unknown||View/Open|
|Waters-Tagliamonte_OA+Upload.pdf||Post-review (final submitted author manuscript)||267.7 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.