Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39805
Title: Infarct size following complete revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: a comparison of immediate and staged in-hospital non-infarct related artery PCI subgroups in the CvLPRIT study
Authors: Khan, Jamal N.
Nazir, Sheraz A.
Greenwood, John P.
Dalby, Miles
Curzen, Nick
Hetherington, Simon
Kelly, Damian J.
Blackman, Daniel
Ring, Arne
Peebles, Charles
Wong, Joyce
Sasikaran, Thiagarajah
Flather, Marcus
Swanton, Howard
Gershlick, Anthony H.
McCann, Gerry P.
First Published: 9-Nov-2016
Publisher: BioMed Central
Citation: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2016, 18:85
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The CvLPRIT study showed a trend for improved clinical outcomes in the complete revascularisation (CR) group in those treated with an immediate, as opposed to staged in-hospital approach in patients with multivessel coronary disease undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). We aimed to assess infarct size and left ventricular function in patients undergoing immediate compared with staged CR for multivessel disease at PPCI. METHODS: The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) substudy of CvLPRIT was a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded endpoint trial in PPCI patients with multivessel disease. These data refer to a post-hoc analysis in 93 patients randomized to the CR arm (63 immediate, 30 staged) who completed a pre-discharge CMR scan (median 2 and 4 days respectively) after PPCI. The decision to stage non-IRA revascularization was at the discretion of the treating interventional cardiologist. RESULTS: Patients treated with a staged approach had more visible thrombus (26/30 vs. 31/62, p = 0.001), higher SYNTAX score in the IRA (9.5, 8-16 vs. 8.0, 5.5-11, p = 0.04) and a greater incidence of no-reflow (23.3 % vs. 1.6 % p < 0.001) than those treated with immediate CR. After adjustment for confounders, staged patients had larger infarct size (19.7 % [11.7-37.6] vs. 11.6 % [6.8-18.2] of LV Mass, p = 0.012) and lower ejection fraction (42.2 ± 10 % vs. 47.4 ± 9 %, p = 0.019) compared with immediate CR. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients randomized to CR in the CMR substudy of CvLPRIT, those in whom the operator chose to stage revascularization had larger infarct size and lower ejection fraction, which persisted after adjusting for important covariates than those who underwent immediate CR. Prospective randomized trials are needed to assess whether immediate CR results in better clinical outcomes than staged CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN70913605 , Registered 24th February 2011.
DOI Link: 10.1186/s12968-016-0298-2
ISSN: 1097-6647
eISSN: 1532-429X
Links: https://jcmr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12968-016-0298-2
http://hdl.handle.net/2381/39805
Version: Publisher Version
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © the authors, 2016. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences



Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.