Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Self help materials for smoking relapse prevention: A process evaluation of the SHARPISH randomised controlled trial
Authors: Notley, Caitlin
Blyth, Annie
Maskrey, Vivienne
Karavadra, Babu
Brown, Tracey
Holland, Richard
Bachmann, Max O.
Brandon, Thomas H.
Song, Fujian
First Published: 24-Feb-2017
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation: Journal of Public Health, 2, pp. 1-8, doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdx013
Abstract: Background: UK Stop Smoking Services are effective at assisting smokers to quit. However, smoking relapse rates are high, representing a significant public health problem. No effective interventions are currently available. This embedded qualitative process evaluation, within a randomized controlled trial of a self-help smoking relapse prevention intervention, aimed to understand patient perspectives in explaining the null trial finding, and to make recommendations for intervention development. Methods: The intervention was a British version of the ‘Forever Free’ self-help booklets (SHARPISH—ISRCTN 36980856). The qualitative evaluation purposefully sampled 43 interview participants, triangulated with the views of 10 participants and 12 health professionals in focus groups. Data were thematically analysed. Results: Analysis revealed important variation in individual engagement with the self-help booklets. Variation was interpreted by the meta-themes of ‘motivation for cessation’, and ‘positioning on information provision’, interacting with the theme of ‘mechanisms for information provision’. Conclusions: Targeting self-help information towards those most motivated to engage may be beneficial, considering the social and cultural realities of individual's lives. Individual preferences for the mechanisms of information delivery should be appraised when designing future interventions. Long-term personalized follow-up may be a simple step in improving smoking relapse rates.
DOI Link: 10.1093/pubmed/fdx013
ISSN: 1741-3842
eISSN: 1741-3850
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2017, Oxford University Press. Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy.
Description: The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Health Sciences

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sharpish_process paper for JPH pre-pint accepted version 19-1-17.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)249.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.