Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||How do late terminations of pregnancy affect comparisons of stillbirth rates in Europe? Analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat Project.|
Hindori-Mohangoo, A. D.
van der Pal-de Bruin, K.
Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee
|Publisher:||Wiley, Royal College of Ostetricians and Gynaecologist (RCOG)|
|Abstract:||OBJECTIVE: to describe how terminations of pregnancy at gestational ages at or above the limit for stillbirth registration are recorded in routine statistics and to assess their impact on comparability of stillbirth rates in Europe. DESIGN: analysis of aggregated data from the Euro-Peristat project. SETTING: 29 European countries. POPULATION: births and late terminations in 2010. METHODS: assessment of terminations as a proportion of stillbirths and derivation of stillbirth rates including and excluding terminations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: stillbirth rates overall and excluding terminations. RESULTS: In 23 countries, it is possible to assess the contribution of terminations to stillbirth rates, either because terminations are rare occurrences or because they can be distinguished from spontaneous stillbirths. Where terminations were reported, they accounted for less than 1.5% of stillbirths at 22+ weeks in Denmark, between 13 and 22% in Germany, Italy, Hungary, Finland and Switzerland, and 39% in France; proportions were much lower at 24+ weeks with the exception of Switzerland (7.4%) and France (39.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Terminations represent a substantial proportion of stillbirths at 22+ weeks of gestation in some countries. Countries where terminations occur at 22+ weeks should publish rates with and without terminations in order to improve international comparisons and the policy relevance of stillbirth statistics.|
|Embargo on file until:||30-May-2018|
|Rights:||Copyright © 2017, Wiley, Royal College of Ostetricians and Gynaecologist (RCOG). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy.|
|Description:||The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.|
|Appears in Collections:||Published Articles, Dept. of Media and Communication|
Files in This Item:
|Blondel_et_al-2017-BJOG-_An_International_Journal_of_Obstetrics_&_Gynaecology.pdf||Post-review (final submitted author manuscript)||537.03 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.