Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination
Authors: Bernardi, Luca
Morales, Laura
Lühiste, Maarja
Bischof, Daniel
First Published: 9-Oct-2017
Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Citation: Environmental Politics, 2018, 27(1)
Abstract: Under what conditions do critical events trigger large-scale public discussion and mobilisation, and can these lead to policy change? In a comparative study of nuclear energy policy after the Japanese Fukushima disaster in March 2011, a theory-development approach is adopted, mobilising data collected from national news agencies’ newswires, public surveys, legislation and parliamentary databases, and newspaper editorials in 12 established democracies between March 2011 and March 2013. The analysis suggests two main hypotheses that can guide future research: critical events are more likely to trigger policy change when intense (contentious) mobilisation from policy challengers aligns with the views of the general public, and is backed by major political allies; and critical events are more likely to trigger intense (contentious) mobilisation when policy challengers articulate their opposition around pre-existing policy debates on the issue and resort to pre-existing organisational and mobilisation resources.
DOI Link: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1383007
ISSN: 0964-4016
eISSN: 1743-8934
Version: Post-print
Status: Peer-reviewed
Type: Journal Article
Rights: Copyright © 2017, Taylor & Francis (Routledge). Deposited with reference to the publisher’s open access archiving policy.
Appears in Collections:Published Articles, Dept. of Politics and International Relations

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BMLB_EP_Fuku_pre_proofsOct2017.pdfPost-review (final submitted author manuscript)1.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in LRA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.